THE MAJOR PURPOSE OF THIS STUDY IS TO ASCERTAIN THE EFFECTS OF PRIVATIZATION AND COMMERCIALIZATION POLICY ON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT USING POWER HOLDING COMPANY OF NIGERIA EKWULOBIA AS A CASE STUDY. THE REASON BEHIND USING THE POWER HOLDING COMPANY OF NIGERIA IS BECAUSE IT IS ONE OF THE PUBLIC ENTERPRISES THAT ITS PRODUCT HAS THE WIDEST CONSUMPTION. THE POPULATION OF THE STUDY CONSISTED OF 254 WORKERS IN PHCN EKWULOBIA ANAMBRA STATE. THE SAMPLE SIZE WAS DETERMINED USING YARO YAMENE FORMULAR. THE SAMPLE OF 155 OUT OF 254 WAS DRAWN USING SIMPLE RANDOM SAMPLING. FIVE RESEARCH QUESTIONS WERE FORMULATED WHICH GUIDE THE STUDY. A STRUCTURED QUESTIONNAIRE WAS DEVELOPED AND VALIDATED FOR USE. TABLE AND PERCENTAGE WERE USED TO ANSWER THE RESEARCH QUESTIONS. THE MAJOR FINDINGS OF THE STUDY WERE: (1) THERE IS GENERAL DISCONTENT BY THE PUBLIC ABOUT PHCN’S SERVICES (2) THERE WAS SERIOUS FLUCTUATING POWER SUPPLY FROM LATE 1992 TO DATE (3) POLITICAL INSTABILITY HAS CONTRIBUTED TO THE PROBLEMS OF PHCN (4) PHCN HAS NOT REGISTERED AS A PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY. THEREAFTER, IT WAS CONCLUDED THAT: (1) THE GENERAL PUBLIC WERE DISSATISFIED WITH THE POOR SERVICES OF THE PHCN. (2) THE SERIOUS FLUCTUATIONS IN THE SUPPLY OF POWER WAS CAUSED BY BREAKDOWN OF THE POWER HOLDING COMPANY’S POWER STATIONS. (3) POLITICAL INSTABILITY IN OUR COUNTRY HAS MADE IT DIFFICULT FOR THE SUCCESSFUL PRIVATIZATION OF PHCN. THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATIONS WERE MADE: (1) PHCN SHOULD ESTABLISH A GOOD PUBLIC RELATION. (2) THERE SHOULD BE REHABILITATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE POWER STATIONS. (3) EFFORTS SHOULD BE MADE BY GOVERNMENT AND STAKEHOLDERS FOR A SUCCESSFUL PRIVATIZATION AND COMMERCIALIZATION OF PHCN.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TITLE PAGE i
APPROVAL PAGE ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS viii
1.0 Introduction 1
1.1 Background of the study 2
1.2 Statement of the problems 5
1.3 Purpose of the study 7
1.4 Significance of study 8
1.5 Research questions 10
1.6 Scope/Delimitation of the study 11
1.7 Limitations of the study 12
1.8 Definition of term 13
2.0 Introduction 16
2.1 Effects of privatization and commercialization policy 17
2.2 Privatization and commercialization in other countries 23
2.3 Privatization and commercialization
In Nigeria 24
2.4 Objectives of privatization and commercializationprogramme. 30
2.5 Effect of sap on electricity supply problems 32
2.6 Electricity generation and transmission capacities34
2.7 Sales and revenue collection in a commercialized
2.8 Summary in literature review 42
3.0 Research methodology 45
3.1 Design of the study 45
3.2 Area of the study 46
3.3 Population of the study 46
3.4 Sample size/sampling techniques 46
3.5 Instrument for data collection 47
3.6 Reliability and validation of the instrument 48
3.7 Distribution and retrieval of the instrument 49
3.8 Method of data analysis 49
4.0 Data presentation and analysis 51
4.1 Presentation of findings 51
4.2 Discussion/Analysis of findings 54
5.0 Summary of findings, Conclusion and Recommendations 57
5.1 Summary 57
5.2 Conclusion 58
5.3 Recommendations 59
The privatization and commercialization of public enterprises in Nigeria was an initiation of the country’s military leaders. The review of the economy in 1985 revealed that most government parastatals were running at great loses. This was attributed to the inefficiency and waste in resource use, as a result of lack of application of capital economic principles in the management of these parastatals.
In an attempt to stem this situation, the Babangida administration decided to privatize and/or commercialize some of these obviously ailing public wealth with the hope of reducing government wasteful expenditure and improve income generation through the commercialization principle.
1.1 BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY
The import substitution policy of the post independence Nigeria led to the establishment of industries. Apart from this prime motivation for import substitution, there was the need to create jobs for the growing educated youths, the need of industrialization and the ideological argument that the government should control, regulate and supervise the commending heights of the then nascent economy.
Furthermore, there was the need to strive to catch up with the developed countries of the world and since the indigenous businessmen and managers were neither technically nor financially ready to assume the catalyst role which their counterparts in the developed countries were playing; government felt obliged to fill the investment gap. The obvious imperfections in the market oriented economics in terms of resources allocation to the more profitable but less preferred sectors of the economy was yet another reason for government intervention in the economy.
The sum total of these is that between 1960 and 1980 the various governments in Nigeria both at federal and state levels established numerous industries. The core characteristics of most of these industries were inefficiency in the utilization of resources and their consequent dependence on the public treasury for subvention. Therefore, these adverse operating condition could not make for rational economic decisions. Consequently, these enterprises and their management lost their mission and became pipes for wastages, agencies for political patronage and generally parasites on the national and state treasuries. There then arose the need for reprioritization of economic policies and the need to release the energy in economy suppressed by bureaucracy and undue control.
Government at various levels realized that goals of economic growth, full employment and high standard of living could not be actualized without the active participation and leadership of the private sector. There was therefore need for invitation to private individuals and organizations to assume the role of activation and management of the national economy. There was also the need for the infection of private sector enterprises for profitability and efficiency, hence the privatization and commercialization policy.