The overriding objective of this study is to explore the of participation of households in differentrnsoil and water conservation practices in enhancing their production and food security andrnexamine their production efficiency Thus, this study analyzes farmerâ€™s choice of single andrncombination choice of SWC practices (i.e. stone bund, soil bund, stone bund and soil bund, soilrnbund with plantation and all conservation practices) and evaluates the impact of theserntechnologies on households food security and also assess their production efficiency andrndeterminants of inefficiency. The necessary data were generated principally from primary and tornsome extent secondary sources to answer the research question. Thus, household surveyrninvolving 290 households was done using questionnaires. Multinomial logit and endogenousrnswitching regression models were employed to achieve the above objectives. In addition, thernstudy employed one stage approach in which both technical efficiency and factors of inefficiencyrnare analyzed simultaneously. The result of endogenous switching model reveals that adoption ofrnSWC practices have a positive and significant impact on householdâ€™s food security. Moreover,rnthe result of the study also shows that households adopting all conservation practices are morernfood secure than other alternative adopters. Failure to adopt SWC practices leads to lower foodrnsecurity status. According to the multinomial logit result, technology adoption is positivelyrnrelated with education/ training, soil fertility, access to extension services, land size andrnlivestock holding. But adoption of agriculture technologies has negative and significant relationrnwith non-marriage status, and distance to the input and out market. On the other hand, studyrnrevealed nearly half of households produce with only 50% percent efficiency and there is a roomrnto improve production efficiency. Slope of farmland, livestock possession, agricultural toolsrnownership and SWC participation are factors that significantly determine efficiency. Increasedrneffort on physical SW conservation activities along with biological, investing more educationrnand training, improving infrastructure/access to services are key recommendation in improvingrnproduction efficiency and food security are stemmed out of the study.