The objective of this study is to evaluate whether or not Arsi customary laws have recogni zedrnwomen's lights as enshrined under the major intemational human rights instruments such asrnUDHR, ICCPR, ICESCR and CEDA W. The study is based on data collected during a period ofrnalmost six years (2005-2011). Women's right to dignity, equality, economy and women's localrninstitutions for the protection and promotion of their rights constitutes the theme of the study.rnWomen's under Arsi customary laws are entitled to dignified life and they assume central role inrnthe life of their family. They are entitled to basic and fundamental human rights and freedoms inrna different way than stipulated under the intemational human lights instruments. The princi plesrnenslu'ined under intemational human rights are individualistic in approach while those providedrnunder Arsi customary laws are more of group rights while individual women's rights is alsornrecognized. The study demonstrates that Arsi women have rights to property and institutionsrnthrough whi ch they protect themselves from violence and keep peace within the family andrnbeyond. The study also inquires about the conflict between the two systems and incidentally thernShari 'a laws whi ch are cunently adding a third dimension to justice system in the study area. Sornthe application of intemational human rights norms without having due regards to the localrn') customs and values on the one hand and the equally competing customary laws and Shari'a lawsrnin the study area on the other hand is posing a challenge women's rights discourse.