Many organizations use project management maturity models to improve their projectrnperformance. This study used Project Management Instituteâ€™s PM solutionâ€™s Maturityrnmodel to assess the maturity level of IOCC. PM solutionâ€™s standard questionnaire werernused to collect data from IOCC project managers, monitoring & evaluation specialists,rnfinance and admin staff and staffs from the leadership. Key informant interview werernconducted with experts from the leadership. Data are analyzed using SPSS to computernaverage project management maturity level of IOCC. Results are discussed qualitativelyrnby comparing the results against the modelâ€™s standard and theoretical reviews. Basedrnon the assessment, IOCC PM Maturity is measured at 1.65 which is identified as level 2,rnwhere structured and standard processes are used but not applied to all projects.rnAmong the knowledge areas, cost and time management have showed better maturityrnlevel 2.26 and 1.96 respectively. On the other hand, human resource and riskrnmanagement and stakeholder management showed the least value measured as 1.15,rn1.39 and 1.39 respectively. Such low maturity score depicts the organization performsrnthe knowledge areas without following structured approach or guideline, relying solelyrnon the knowledge and experience of the project team. As a result, the paperrnrecommended there is a need to allocate resource for capacity building, standardizernproject management at institutional level. There is also a need to use computerizedrnsystem for centralizing information and create experience sharing mechanisms amongrnstaff to transform individual understanding to enterprise wide knowledge and reach tornthe next level 3 and also help for a continuous learning to reach to level 4 and 5.