The thematic focus of this research is to put light on the international fora revolving and makingrnscrutiny on the Ethiopian legal system around BS in REDD+. Based on data collected fromrnprimary and secondary sources, and analysis finds out challenges and opportunities of BSrnsystems in Ethiopia. Accordingly, it is becoming more complex and sophisticated than itrnperceived at the time of its inception, and creating perpetuating power differentials. Legalrnuncertainty over sequestered carbon remains highly prevalent, and due to low carbon prices,rnthere are concerns over the sustainability of the programme. Lack of definitions for the benefits,rnbeneficiaries and struggle to be a beneficiary, leakage, elite capture, good governance and lawrnenforcement, and unclear jurisdiction between stakeholders are significant identified challengesrnin a national legal framework. As an opportunity, being implemented in a phased approach,rnwhich in turn provide for identification of root causes of deforestation and forest degradationrnand detail information, including legal and policy frameworks assessment, ongoing process ofrnMRV and RBPs are enhancing opportunities for voluntary compliance, economic incentives, andrnco-benefits. Finally, this research recommends, in the absence of particular REDD+ BS legalrnframeworks, the legal character of the REDD+ BS elements could draw on existing laws andrnhouse in existing laws regarding environment, forests or natural resource management.