Individuals Constitutional Complaints Under The Ethiopian Constitutional Litigation System The Law And The Practice.

This thesis is aimed to focus on comparative perspective of Individuals’ ConstitutionalrnComplaints in general view of different countries of the world and their different legalrnmechanisms, as well as it is, particularly, intended to point-up on Ethiopian current Individuals’rnConstitutional direct access to complaints and the procedural system. Most of the time therncountries’ experiences evidenced that their differences lied on their legal system which means,rnobviously, the common law legal system or the continental or civil law legal tradition. Theirrndifferences also are positioned in their political and constitutional culture of both sides. But,rnsurprisingly, in some countries’ practices it could find out that merged or fused or modified kindrnof constitutional litigation system. There are also other kinds of models out of these two abovernmentioned that their Constitutional Adjudication systems are organized, for example, in theirrnConstitutional Council, Second Chamber or the National Council, Parliament or specializedrnparliamentary bodies, etc.rnThe author of this thesis really impressed to the Individual Constitutional Complaints (ICC)rneither experiences of the constitutional court or the amparo proceeding of judicial review ofrnconstitutional rights. The third alternative, the focal point of this writing is, to which itsrnconstitutional jurisdiction is existed under the parliament or the Upper House or the House ofrnFederation (HoF) or some say it the Second Chamber. The FDRE constitution furnished a powerrnto the House of Federation to interpret the constitution. It stated that the House has the power torninterpret the Constitution.1 Thus, the Ethiopian new constitutional system emerging a newfangledrnexperience that is neither a constitutional court’s nor a supreme court’s judicial reviewrnjurisdiction of constitutional interpretational mechanism.rnAs it is attempted to highlight above, the purpose of this research paper doesn’t mean to showrnthe constitutional adjudication system merely, instead this Research Paper deliberately to focusrnon and to shin out the Individuals’ Constitutional Complaints system of the Ethiopianrncontemporary legal and practical experiences. Indeed, the constitutional adjudication orrnconstitutional review arrangement of one country is strictly interrelated with the subject matterrnof this thesis. For the rationale of the Individuals’ Constitutional Complaints system of thernEthiopian contemporary legal and practical experiences, this thesis is organized into four mainrnchapters. Chapter one deals with the introduction, chapter two focuses on comparative aspectsrnof other countries experience of ICC, chapter three discusses the Ethiopian current legal andrnpractical arrangements with regard to ICC and chapter four encompasses with conclusion andrnrecommendations.

Get Full Work

Report copyright infringement or plagiarism