This study is designed to deal with some linguistic features of Benchnon and Shenon dialects inrna comparative way. The objective of the study is to show variations in some phonological,rnmorphological, lexical items and semantic differences in the two dialects. The methodsrnimplemented in the study are through eliciting forms from the speech of native speakers of therntwo dialects, and through using published literatures as a secondary source. Both descriptivernand comparative approaches are used to find out the dialectal variation in the two dialects.rnThe findings of the study indicate that there are variations in phonological, morphologicalrnlexical items and semantic differences between the two dialects. Chapter one of the study dealsrnwith the people and language. Chapter two of the study deals with the conceptual framework ofrnstudy. Chapter three of the study deals with phonological features of the two dialects. Underrnphonology variation in the two dialects is attested in the syllabic nasal, tonal distribution,rnmeaning change and phonological differences in some words. Chapter four of the study dealsrnwith morphological features, and under this, the two dialects show variations in some nounrninflections, pronouns, case, verb inflections, aspect and tense, negation and ordinal numbers.rnChapter five of the study deals with lexical variations and semantic differences. Under lexicalrnitems variation is attested in some word classes, cardinal numbers and days of the week. Underrnsemantic, variation is attested in some words in Benchnon and Shenon.rnThe language has some unique natures, such as tone and uncommon sounds when it isrncompared with other Omotic languages in Ethiopia. The language is unwritten language untilrnthe resent year and it is now on the process to be written language. This process shouldrnconsider the nature of the language, the relation and difference between the two dialects to havernclear grammar and sociolinguistic profile