Addi Ababa as per eived by trainers, trainees, college principals, and construction industries.rnThe four components of the program that have been evaluated are: Content- in terms of thernadequacy of the course and course content,' Input- in terms of the availability and adequacy ofrnwell qualified trainers, reference materials, and raw materials that would be used to overcomernthe difficulties in meeting objectives; Process- in terms of the real gap between actual programrnoperation This is a de criptive evaluative study of Building Construction Program in five TVET Colleges ofrnduring i1nplementation stage and the original design; and Product- in terms of thernevaluation of outcomes in relation to the program's objectives. The study was conducted byrnemploying the CIPP model for program evaluation. The sample included 130 trainees, 30rntrainers, five college principals, and four construction industries. The data, which was collectedrnby the use of questionnaires and unstructured interview, resulted in findings among which thernfollowing are to be indicated- The objectives stated for Building Construction Program is notrnadequately adjusted by using the present existing training materials, tools, machineries, andrnequipment in T VET colleges, trainer's p art in curriculum development process particularly inrnsetting objectives and content while it was drafted looks insignificant, trainees assigned inrnBuilding construction program are not according to their interest, there are no adequaternreference materials and textbooks in Building Construction program, the apprenticeshiprnprogram implemented once in a year appears to be minimal, there is loose link between TVETrncolleges and Construction Industry. Finally, based on the findings, recommendations werernstated.